JOURNAL OF THE CZECH PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY AND THE SLOVAK PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY

Čes. slov. farm. 2022, 71(3):116-120 | DOI: 10.5817/CSF2022-3-116

Study of possible sex features of ramipril and candesartan treatment under experimental arterial hypertension in rats

Natalia Tsubanova1, Alona Kovpak2,*, Igor Zamorskyi2
1 National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine
2 Bukovinian State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine

The article presents the results of a preclinical study of ramipril and candesartan in an experimental group of hypertensive rats of different sexes. Antihypertensive therapy was performed for 21 days. The drugs were administered daily in moderate therapeutic doses calculated for rats using the coefficient of species sensitivity. It was found that the course of experimental hypertension has gender differences, and in males, according to blood pressure, the level of NO metabolites is more pronounced. The use of ramipril from the group of ACE inhibitors and candesartan from the ARBs group in experimental hypertension in rats has gender differences. Ramipril is likely to be more effective in normalizing blood pressure and endothelial function in males than females. The use of candesartan did not show significant gender differences, but there was a tendency for females to be slightly more effective than males. Established gender differences in hypertension pharmacotherapy should be considered to optimize treatment.

Keywords: hypertension; gender differences; ramipril; candesartan

Received: February 18, 2022; Accepted: April 27, 2022; Published: March 1, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tsubanova N, Kovpak A, Zamorskyi I. Study of possible sex features of ramipril and candesartan treatment under experimental arterial hypertension in rats. Čes. slov. farm. 2022;71(3):116-120. doi: 10.5817/CSF2022-3-116.
Download citation

References

  1. Regitz-Zagrosek V., Kararigas G. Mechanistic pathways of sex differences in cardiovascular disease. Physiol. Rev. 2017; 97(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00021.2015 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Marques A. P., Szwarcwald C. L., Pires D. C., Rodrigues J. M., Almeida W. D. S., Romero D. Factors associated with arterial hypertension: a systematic review. Cien Saude Colet. 2020; 25(6), 2271-2282. Portuguese. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020256.26972018 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Eric D. A. Sex hormones across the menstrual cycle in pulmonary arterial hypertension: adding a new layer of complexity. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2021; 18(2), 209-211. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202011-1379ED Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Tang C., Luo Y., Li S., Huang B., Xu S., Li L. Characteristics of inflammation process in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021; 133, 111081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111081 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Zimmerman M. A., Budish R. A., Kashyap S., Lindsey S. H. GPER-novel membrane oestrogen receptor. Clin. Sci. 2016; 130(12), 1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20160114 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hester J., Ventetuolo C., Lahm T. Sex, gender, and sex hormones in pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure. Compr. Physiol. 2020; 10(1), 125-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c190011 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. DuPont J. J., Kenney R. M., Patel A. R., Jaffe I. Z. Sex differences in mechanisms of arterial stiffness. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019;176(21), 4208-4225. https://doi.org/10.1111 /bph.14624 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Ge X., Zhu T., Zhang X., Liu Y., Wang Y., Zhang W. Gender differences in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients with BMPR2 mutation: a meta-analysis. Respir. Res. 2020; 21(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-1309-2 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Agarwala A., Michos E. D., Samad Z., Ballantyne C. M., Virani S. S. The use of sex-specific factors in the assessment of women's cardiovascular risk. Circulation 2020; 141(7), 592-599. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043429 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ojji D., Mayosi B., Francis V., Badri M., et al. for the CREOLE Study Investigators. Comparison of dual therapies for lowering blood pressure in black Africans. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019; 380, 2429-2439. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1901113 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Costa E. C., Hay J. L., Kehler D. S., Boreskie K. F. Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in adults with pre-to established hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Sports Med. 2018; 48, 2127-2142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Stefanova O. V. Preclinical drug studies. Guideline. Kyiv: Avicenna 2001.
  13. Reznikov O. G. General ethical principles of animal experiments. Endocrinology 2003; 8(1), 142-145.
  14. AnalystSoft Inc., StatPlus - program pro statistickou analýzu. Verze 6. Režim elektronického přístupu, www. analystsoft.com
  15. Skibitsky V. V, Gorodetskaya E. V., Fendrikova A. V., Kudryashov E. A. Gender features of combined antihypertensive therapy in patients with hypertension and coronary heart disease. Cardiovasc. Ther. Prevent. 2014; 13 (5), 14-21. Go to original source...
  16. Denton K. M., Hilliard L. M., Tare М. Sex-related differences in hypertension: seek and ye shall find. Hypertension 2013; 62, 674-677. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Czech and Slovak Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.