Čes. slov. farm. 2025, 74(2):96-102 | DOI: 10.36290/csf.2025.013
Proposal of limit values for surface contamination by cytotoxic drugs in pharmacies and hospitals
- 1 Masarykův onkologický ústav, Brno
- 2 Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta, RECETOX, Brno
Introduction: Cytotoxic drugs (cytostatics), widely used in the treatment of not only cancer diseases, are substances with potentially dangerous properties for healthcare personnel. Long-term daily exposure to cytostatics is associated with the possible manifestation of their genotoxic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects. Handling of these drugs (during receipt, storage, preparation, packaging, transport, administration) can lead to contamination of the workplace and thus to exposure of healthcare personnel present.
Objective: The aim of our work was to propose, based on previous results and experience gained from long-term monitoring, a limit threshold value for surface contamination with cytotoxic drugs.
Methodology: As part of the long-term monitoring (2008-2021) of surface contamination by cytostatics in pharmacies and hospitals in the Czech and Slovak Republics, the presence of eight drugs (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, methotrexate, irinotecan, paclitaxel, fluorouracil, gemcitabine and platinum as a representative of platinum cytostatics - oxaliplatin, carboplatin, cisplatin) was monitored. Samples were taken by employees of individual healthcare facilities and surface contamination was evaluated by the RECETOX Research Center of Masaryk University Brno using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.
Results: our study evaluated the surface contamination of cytostatics in 40 pharmacies (N = 1,277 samples) and 43 hospitals (N = 946 samples). Based on the results obtained and in accordance with currently known knowledge, we propose a threshold value of 100 pg/cm2 as the limit value of permissible contamination of cytostatics for most areas in pharmacies and hospitals (reception, storage, packaging, transport, application). On the one hand, contamination in isolator areas, where cytostatics are prepared in a controlled environment and using effective protective equipment and where their increased presence can therefore be "expected", should be perceived differently, and on the other hand, areas in administrative facilities and day rooms, where no protective equipment is used and contamination should therefore be zero.
Conclusions: Knowledge of the level of contamination in healthcare facilities working with cytotoxic drugs helps to set up work processes so that the working environment is safe for employees. Regular monitoring is an important tool. The proposal of a value of 100 pg/cm2 as an exposure hygiene limit represents the first step towards implementing mandatory monitoring into national legislation.
Keywords: cytostatics, cytotoxic drugs, surface contamination, monitoring of the working environment.
Accepted: May 28, 2025; Published: June 18, 2025 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
PDF will be unlocked 18.6.2026 |
References
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-49.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Alexander M, Connor TH, Bauters T, et al. ISOPP standards for the safe handling of cytotoxics. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2022;28:S1-S126.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Cherrie JW, Hutchings S, Gorman Ng M, et al. Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment. Br J Cancer. 2017;117:274-81.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Valanis BG, Vollmer WM, Labuhn KT, et al. Acute symptoms associated with antineoplastic drug handling among nurses. Cancer Nurs. 1993;16:288-95.
Go to original source...
- Krstev S, Perunicic B, Vidakovic A, et al. Work practice and some adverse health effects in nurses handling antineoplastic drugs. Med Lav. 2003;94:432-9.
- European Commision. Guidance for the safe management of hazardous medicinal products at work [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ee1e6d15-4095-11ee-952f-01aa75ed71a1/language-en7.
- Vyhl. 84/2008 o správné lékárenské praxi, bližších podmínkách zacházení s léčivy v lékárnách, zdravotnických zařízeních a u dalších provozovatelů a zařízení vydávajících léčivé přípravky. 2008. Available from: https://www.psp.cz/sqw/sbirka.sqw?cz=84&r=2008.
- Bláhová L, Kuta J, Doležalová L, et al. Levels and risks of antineoplastic drugs in households of oncology patients, hospices and retirement homes. Environ Sci Eur. 2021;33:1-14.
Go to original source...
- Doležalová L, Bláhová L, Kuta J, et al.; Levels and risks of surface contamination by thirteen antineoplastic drugs in the Czech and Slovak hospitals and pharmacies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022; 29:26810-9.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH). Managing Hazardous Drug Exposures: Information for Healthcare Settings. 2023;2023-130.
- Mathias PI, MacKenzie BA, Toennis CA, et al. Survey of guidelines and current practices for safe handling of antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs used in 24 countries. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019;25:148-62.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Sottani C, Grignani E, Cornacchia M, et al. Occupational exposure assessment to antineoplastic drugs in nine italian hospital centers over a 5-year survey program. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:8601-18.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Jeronimo M, Colombo M, Astrakianakis G, et al. A surface wipe sampling and LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of six antineoplastic drugs commonly handled by healthcare workers. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:7083-92.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kopp B, Schierl R, Nowak D. Evaluation of working practices and surface contamination with antineoplastic drugs in outpatient oncology health care settings. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;86:47-55.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Astrakianakis G, Jeronimo M, Griffiths A, et al. The application of novel field measurement and field evaluation protocols for assessing health care workers' exposure risk to antineoplastic drugs. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020;17:373-82.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Schierl R, Böhlandt A, Nowak D. Guidance values for surface monitoring of antineoplastic drugs in german pharmacies. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009;53:703-11.
- Korczowska E, Crul M, Tuerk J, et al. Environmental contamination with cytotoxic drugs in 15 hospitals from 11 European countries - results of the MASHA project. Eur J Oncol Pharm. 2020;3:e24.
Go to original source...
- Sottani C, Grignani E, Oddone E, et al. Monitoring surface contamination by antineoplastic drugs in Italian hospitals: Performance-based hygienic guidance values (HGVs) Project. Ann Work Expo Heal. 2017;61:1-9.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hedmer M, Wohlfart G. Hygienic guidance values for wipe sampling of antineoplastic drugs in Swedish hospitals. J Environ Monit. 2012;14:1968-75.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Labrèche F, Ouellet C, Roberge B, et al. Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs: what about hospital sanitation personnel? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94:1877-88.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Sessink PJ. Environmental contamination with cytostatic drugs: past, present and future. Saf Considerations Oncol Pharm Special Ed. 2011;12:3-5.
- Connor TH, Zock MD, Snow AH. Surface wipe sampling for antineoplastic (chemotherapy) and other hazardous drug residue in healthcare settings: Methodology and recommendations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13:658-67.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kiffmeyer TK, Tuerk J, Hahn M, et al. Application and assessment of a regular environmental monitoring of the antineoplastic drug contamination level in pharmacies-the MEWIP project. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57:444-55.
- Crul M, Simons-Sanders K. Carry-over of antineoplastic drug contamination in Dutch hospital pharmacies. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018;24:483-9.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bláhová L, Bláha L, Doležalová L, et al. Proposals of guidance values for surface contamination by antineoplastic drugs based on long term monitoring in Czech and Slovak hospitals and pharmacies. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1235496.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Odraska P, Dolezalova L, Kuta L, et al. Association of surface contamination by antineoplastic drugs with different working conditions in hospital pharmacies association of surface contamination by antineoplastic drugs with different working conditions in hospital pharmacies. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2014;693:148-58.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bláha L, Bláhová L, Kuta J, et al. Vzorkování vnitřních prostor zdravotnických zařízení a domácností onkologických pacientů za účelem sledování hladin kontaminace cytotoxickými léčivy a omezování souvisejících rizik. Certifikovaná metodika MZ. 2023.
- Bláhová L, Kuta J, Doležalová L, et al. The efficiency of antineoplastic drug contamination removal by widely used disinfectants-laboratory and hospital studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;24:5.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- European Commission Directorate-General for Employment Social Affairs Inclusion Sand. Jespersen M, Lassen C, Madsen P. Study Supporting the Assessment of Different Options Concerning the Protection of Workers from Exposure to Hazardous Medicinal Products, including Cytotoxic Medicinal Products - Final Report, Publications Office. 2021. Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/17127.
- Chabut C, Tanguay C, Gagné S, et al. Surface contamination with nine antineoplastic drugs in 109 canadian centers; 10 years of a monitoring program. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 2021;28:343-352.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Acramel A, Foquet J, Blondeel-Gomes S, et al. Application of an environmental monitoring to assess the practices and control the risk of occupational exposure to cyclophosphamide in two sites of a french comprehensive cancer center. Annal Work Exp Health. 2021;2:wxac035.
- Connor TH, Zock MD, Snow AH. Surface wipe sampling for antineoplastic (chemotherapy) and other hazardous drug residue in healthcare settings: Methodology and recommendations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13:658-67.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Labrèche F, Ouellet C, Roberge B, et al. Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs: what about hospital sanitation personnel? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94:1877-88.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Dugheri S, Mucci N, Bucaletti E, et al. Monitoring of surface contamination for thirty antineoplastic drugs: a new proposal for surface exposure levels (SELs). Med. Pr. 2022;73:383-96.]
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Simon N, Odou P, Decaudin B, et al. Efficiency of degradation or desorption methods in antineoplastic drug decontamination: a critical review. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019;25:929-46.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...