JOURNAL OF THE CZECH PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY AND THE SLOVAK PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY

Čes. slov. farm. 2016, 65(5):176-181 | DOI: 10.36290/csf.2016.034

The conscientious objection among pharmacists in the Slovak Republic

Tünde Ambrus1,*, Jozef Kolář1,2, Radka Krempaská2
1 Veterinární a farmaceutická univerzita Brno, Farmaceutická fakulta, Ústav aplikované farmacie
2 Univerzita veterinárskeho lekárstva a farmácie v Košiciach, Katedra lekárenstva a sociálnej farmácie

There were two primary objectives of this study: 1. bibliographic analysis of literature on pharmacists and conscientious objection, 2. analysis of present condition and attitudes of pharmacists (n = 100) and pharmacy students (n = 100) towards conscientious objection in the Slovak Republic. Data were obtained from the survey using by questionnaire.
Almost all, 191 (95.5%) respondents knew the phrase "conscientious objection". The respondents claimed this right to refuse filling prescriptions written for emergency post-coital contraception in 43.5%, and dispensing of hormonal contraception in 26.5%. Most participants, 178 (89.0%) think that pharmacists have the right to conscientious objection. 65 respondents (32.5%) implement this right in their practice.

Keywords: conscientious objection; pharmacists; pharmacy students; Pro-life pharmacies

Received: August 4, 2016; Accepted: November 14, 2016; Published: May 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ambrus T, Kolář J, Krempaská R. The conscientious objection among pharmacists in the Slovak Republic. Čes. slov. farm. 2016;65(5):176-181. doi: 10.36290/csf.2016.034.
Download citation

References

  1. Výhrada svědomí. http://www.katopedia.cz/index.php?title=V%C3%BDhrada_sv%C4%9Bdom%C3%AD (25. 7. 2016).
  2. Zákon č. 578/2004 Z. z. o poskytovateľoch zdravotnej starostlivosti, zdravotníckych pracovníkoch, stavovských organizáciách v zdravotníctve a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov.
  3. Snopková M., Némethyová Z. Výhrada svedomia farmaceuta. IX. zjazd slovenskej farmaceutickej spoločnosti venovaný 95. výročiu založenia Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave. Bratislava 4.-6. 9. 2014 (poster). Cit. podle Farm. Obzor 2014; 83, 153.
  4. Snopková M., Oleárová A. Farmaceut ako zdravotnícky pracovník a výhrada vo svedomí. In: Humeník I., Szaniszló I-M., Zoláková Z. (eds.) Reprodukčné zdravie ženy v centre záujmu - Právne, bioetické, medicínske a psychosociálne aspekty starostlivosti o ženské zdravie. 1. vydanie. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer, s.r.o., 2014; 399-413.
  5. Vondráček J., Mikulová M. Výhrada svědomí ve farmaceutické praxi. Angis Rev. 2013; 6(5), 76-77.
  6. Macešková B., Hobzová M. Výhrada svědomí v profesi farmaceuta. Čes. slov. Farm. 2014; 63, 174-177. Go to original source...
  7. Knack A. V. Impfzwang mit oder ohne Gewissensklausel. Hippokrates 1953; 24, 565-567.
  8. Huber H. G. Impfzwang oder Gewissensklausel? Hippokrates 1953; 24, 756-758.
  9. Brushwood D. B. Conscientious objection and abortifacient drugs. Clin. Ther. 1993; 15(1), 204-212.
  10. Mullan K., Allen W. L., Blushwood D. B. Conscientious objection to assisted death: Can pharmacy address this in a systematic fashion? Ann. Pharmacother. 1996; 30, 1185-1191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Sutton E. J., Upshur R. E. G. Are there different spheres of conscience? J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2010; 16, 338-343. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. The role of pharmacy in supporting the public's health. An EPF white paper and call to action. European Pharmacists Forum, March 2015, 156 s.
  13. Piecuch A., Gryka M., Kozlowska-Wojciechowska M. Attitudes towards conscientious objection among community pharmacists in Poland. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2014; 36, 310-315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Shacter H. E., Gee, R. E., Long, J. A. Variation in availability of emergency contraception in pharmacies. Contraception 2007; 75, 214-217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Davidson L. A., Pettis C. T., Joiner A. J., et al. Religion and conscientious objection: A survey of pharmacists' willingness to dispense medications. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010; 71, 161-165. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Zákon č. 372/2011 Sb. o zdravotních službách a podmínkách jejich poskytování (zákon o zdravotních službách).
  17. Ibis Reproductive Health. Second Chance Denied: Emergency Contraception in Catholic Hospital Emergency Rooms, Washington DC, January 2002, 24 s. http://www.ibisreproductivehealth.org/publications/second-chance-denied-emergency-contraception-catholic-hospital-emergency-rooms (1. 8. 2016).
  18. Pichon and Sajous v. France (2001), App. No. 49853/99, Eur. Ct. H.R. 2001-X, decision on admissibility, [Pichon and Sajous].
  19. Lamačková A. Conscientious Objection in Reproductive Health Care: Analysis of Pichon and Sajous v. France. Eur. J. Health Law 2008; 15, 7-43. Go to original source...
  20. Pro-life lekárne. http://kormidlo.sk/nakupujte-v-prolife-lekarnach/#.V5y6CsYcSUk (28. 3. 2016).
  21. Kuklovský A. Aktívny marketing a spolupráca Plus lekárne s výrobcami. http://www.androsa.cz/files/iv.-otc-sk-10-kuklovsky.pdf (30. 7. 2016).
  22. Pharmacists for Life International. http://www.pfli.org/main.php?pfli=aboutus#.V6LwJcYcSUk (1. 8. 2016)
  23. Lékárníci pro život, z. s. http://lekarniciprozivot.cz/?page_id=7 (1. 8. 2016).
  24. Zoláková Z. Výhrada svedomia a ochrana reprodukčných práv. Slov. Lek. 2012; 22(36), 239-244.
  25. Wernow J. R., Grant D. G. Dispensing with conscience: A legal and ethical assessment. Ann. Pharmacother. 2008; 42, 1669-1678. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Czech and Slovak Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.