JOURNAL OF THE CZECH PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY AND THE SLOVAK PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY

Čes. slov. farm. 2014, 63(4):174-177 | DOI: 10.36290/csf.2014.034

Prick of conscience in the pharmaceutical profession

Božena Macešková*, Michaela Hobzová
Ústav aplikované farmacie FaF, Veterinární a farmaceutická univerzita, Brno

The work of the pharmacist in a pharmacy requires from him not only to solve professional and economic issues, but often the ethical ones as well. For a patient's good it is necessary to choose a morally correct decision, but the fulfilment of any patient's wish according to his or her own ideas of good is not a law for the health worker. The paper describes the situations when the pharmacist when fulfilling the requirement of the patient (often in the form of a medical prescription) may feel prick of conscience. A questionnaire survey has revealed that prick of conscience confronts more often those who are being trained for the profession than those who already practise it. The right for prick of conscience is considered unfounded by some pharmacists with practical experience, whereas undergraduates view it as a possibility of expressing one's own attitude. The paper analyzes the issues which in both categories of respondents are considered to be prick of conscience: oral hormonal contraception, including postcoital contraception, and preparations produced from the cells of aborted embryos.

Keywords: conscience; prick of conscience; hormonal contraception; postcoital contraception; pharmacist

Received: May 27, 2014; Accepted: July 13, 2014; Published: April 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Macešková B, Hobzová M. Prick of conscience in the pharmaceutical profession. Čes. slov. farm. 2014;63(4):174-177. doi: 10.36290/csf.2014.034.
Download citation

References

  1. Haškovcová H. Lékařská etika. 3. vyd. Praha: Galén 2002.
  2. Kořenek J. Lékařská etika. 1. vyd. Praha: Triton 2000.
  3. Deklarace prav počatého dítěte. http://euportal.parlamentnilisty. cz.
  4. Skočovský K. Akceptabilita metod přirozené kontroly početí: dimenze a determinanty. Brno 2007. Dizertační práce. Masarykova univerzita v Brně. Filozofická fakulta.
  5. Databáze léků - doprovodné texty. http://www.sukl.cz.
  6. Rob L., Martan A., Citterbalt K. Gynekologie. 1. vyd. Praha: Galén 2008.
  7. Larimore W. L., Stanford J. B. Postfertilization effects of oral contraceptives and their relationship to informed consent. Archives of Family Medicine 2000; 9, 126-133. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dye H. M., Stanford J. B., Alder S.C., Kim S. H., Murény P. A. Women and postfertilization effects of birth control: consistency of beliefs, intentions and reported use. BMC Women's Health 2005; 5, 11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. de Irala J., Lopez del Burgo C., Lopez de Fez C. M., Arredondo J., Mikolajczyk R. T., Stanford J. B. Women's attitudes towards mechanisms of action of family planning methods: survey in primary health centres in Pamplona, Spain BMC Women's Health 2007; 7, 10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Čepický P., Líbalová Z. Postoje žen ke kombinované orální kontracepci. Moderní gynekologie a porodnictví 2003; 12(1, Suppl. B), 191-208.
  11. Uzel R. Antikoncepční kuchařka: aneb cesty k sexuálnímu zdraví. 1. vyd. Praha: Grada Publishing 1999.
  12. Keková T. Informovanost žen o rizicích v souvislosti s užíváním hormonální antikoncepce. Olomouc 2014. Diplomová práce. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. Pedagogická fakulta.
  13. Šmíd M. K podstate a zmyslu slobody svedomia a slobody náboženstva: In: Moravčíková M. Výhrada vo svedomí - Conscientious Objection. Bratislava: Ústav pre vzťahy štátu a církví 2007.
  14. Madleňáková L. Výhrada svědomí jako součást svobody myšlení, svědomí a náboženského vyznání. 1. vyd. Praha: Linde 2010.
  15. Zákon č. 372/2011 Sb. o zdravotních službách a podmínkách jejich poskytování, v platném znění.




Czech and Slovak Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.