JOURNAL OF THE CZECH PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY AND THE SLOVAK PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY

Čes. slov. farm. 2007, 56(5):230-234

Effect of vanadium compounds on the growth and production of coumarins in the suspension culture of Angelica archangelica L.

T. Siatka, M. Kašparová
Katedra farmakognozie Farmaceutické fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Hradec Králové

Plant tissue cultures represent a promising source of substances of natural origin. The main problem of their use is a low production of the majority of secondary metabolites. One of the methods of increasing the production of these substances is elicitation, because the biosynthesis of many secondary metabolites in plant cells is part of the defensive reaction against biological or abiotic stress influences. The paper tested vanadium compounds as potential elicitors of the production of coumarins: sodium vanadate (0.2; 1; 10; 100 and 1000 μM/l of medium) and vanadyl sulfate (10; 20; 50; 100; 200 and 500 μM/l of medium). The toxicity of these substances for the culture was simultaneously monitored by means of the evaluation of the effects on growth (characterized by fresh and dry weights of biomass at the end of two-week cultivation). The cultures were grown both in the light and dark. The growth of the cultures was not influenced by sodium vanadate at concentrations of 0.2 to 100 μM. A vanadate concentration of 1000 μM acted already toxically (in comparison with the control culture, the fresh weight was decreased by 28 % and the dry weight by 41 % when cultivated in the light; the fresh weight by 69 % and the dry weight by 66 % when cultivated in the dark). Vanadyl sulfate in concentrations of 10 to 50 μM did not affect the growth of the culture, at higher concentrations it decreased it gradually; a concentration of 500 μM acted already toxically, again more markedly when cultivated in the light (in comparison with the control culture, the fresh weight was decreased by 27 % and dry weight by 38 % when cultivated in the light; the fresh weight by 65 % and the dry weight by 61 % when cultivated in the dark). The production of coumarins was stimulated by sodium vanadate in a concentration of 0.2 and 1 μM when cultivated in the light. The content of coumarins increased in comparison with the control culture mainly in the medium by 46 % and by 25 % at vanadate concentrations of 0.2 and 1 μM, respectively. Vanadyl sulfate did not increase the production of coumarins.

Keywords: Angelica archangelica L.; suspension culture; growth; coumarins production; vanadium; toxicity; vanadate; vanadyl sulfate

Received: July 4, 2007; Accepted: August 15, 2007; Published: May 1, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Siatka T, Kašparová M. Effect of vanadium compounds on the growth and production of coumarins in the suspension culture of Angelica archangelica L. Čes. slov. farm. 2007;56(5):230-234.
Download citation

References

  1. Wu, J., Lin, L.: Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2002; 59, 51.
  2. Lee, M. H. et al.: Proc. Biochem., 2007; 42, 899. Go to original source...
  3. Thanh, N. T. et al.: Biol. Plant., 2006; 50, 752. Go to original source...
  4. Srivastava, S., Srivastava, A. K.: Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 2007; 27, 29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Chung, B. Y. et al.: Rad. Phys. Chem., 2006; 75, 1018.
  6. Tanwar, Y. S., Mathur, M., Ramawat, K. G.: Plant Growth Regul., 2007; 51, 93. Go to original source...
  7. Radman, R. et al.: Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 2003; 37, 91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Quian, Z. G. et al.: Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2006; 71, 164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Gadzovska, S. et al.: Plant Cell Org. Tiss. Cult., 2007; 89, 1. Go to original source...
  10. Zhang, C. H. et al.: Plant Sci., 2007; 172, 158. Go to original source...
  11. Murashige, T., Skoog, F.: Physiol. Plant., 1962; 15, 473. Go to original source...
  12. Paseková, H., Polášek, M., Solich, P.: Chem. Listy, 1999; 93, 354.
  13. Armero, J., Tena, M.: Plant Sci., 2001; 161, 791. Go to original source...
  14. Villegas, M., Sommarin, M., Brodelius, P. E.: Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2000; 38, 233. Go to original source...
  15. Tallevi, S. G., DiCosmo, F.: Planta Med., 1988; 54, 149. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Bonfill, M. et al.: Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2003; 41, 91. Go to original source...
  17. Szakiel, A. et al.: Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2003; 41, 271. Go to original source...
  18. Chattopadhyay, S. et al.: J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2002; 93, 215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Walker, T. S. Bais, H. P., Vivanco, J. M: Phytochemistry, 2002; 60, 289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ohlsson, A. B., Berglund, T.: J. Plant Physiol., 1989; 135, 505. Go to original source...




Czech and Slovak Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.