JOURNAL OF THE CZECH PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY AND THE SLOVAK PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY

Čes. slov. farm. 2005, 54(1):47-51

Effect of Manganese (II), Cobalt (II), and Nickel (II) Ions on the Growth and Production of Coumarins in the Suspension Culture of Angelica archangelica L.

T. Siatka1, M. Kašparová1, H. Sklenářová2, P. Solich2
1 Katedra farmakognozie Farmaceutické fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Hradec Králové
2 Katedra analytické chemie Farmaceutické fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Hradec Králové

The plant cell reacts to an increased concentration of metals in the environment by various mechanisms. They include an increase in the formation of heat-shock proteins, metallothioneins, phytochelatins, amino acids (cysteine, histidine), organic acids (citric, malic), or secondary metabolites. The latter mechanism is being investigated for its possible use in explant cultures for the stimulation of secondary metabolism, which is the source of substances of pharmaceutical importance. The study tested manganese (II) (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 mM in the medium), cobalt (II), and nickel (II) ions (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 μM in the medium) as potential elicitors of coumarin production. At the same time, toxicity of these metals for the culture was examined by evaluating their effect on growth (characterized by fresh and dry weight of biomass at the end of a two-week cultivation). Cultures were cultivated in the dark and in the light. It has been found that the growth of cultures is not influenced by manganese in concentrations ranging from 0 to 2 mM, then it slightly decreases, at a concentration of 50 mM it is lower by 20 % when cultivated in the dark and by 30 % when cultivated in the light in comparison with the control. Cobalt in concentrations of 0 to 50 μM does not significantly influence the growth of the culture, higher concentrations decrease the biomass yields, more markedly when cultivated in the light (at 500 μM Co by 60 %, in the dark only by 30 % in comparison with the controls). Nickel in concentrations of 0.1 to 200 μM does not influence growth, and in a concentration of 500 μM decreases it by approximately 30 % in comparison with the control both in the light and dark. Production of coumarins was not stimulated by any metal in comparison with the control cultures, only the removal of manganese from the medium in the culture cultivated in the dark increased production by about 15 % versus the control.

Keywords: Angelica archangelica L.; suspension culture; growth; coumarins; manganese; cobalt; nickel; sequential injection analysis

Received: February 2, 2004; Accepted: March 2, 2004; Published: January 1, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Siatka T, Kašparová M, Sklenářová H, Solich P. Effect of Manganese (II), Cobalt (II), and Nickel (II) Ions on the Growth and Production of Coumarins in the Suspension Culture of Angelica archangelica L. Čes. slov. farm. 2005;54(1):47-51.
Download citation

References

  1. Wu, J., Lin, L.: Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2002; 59, 51. Go to original source...
  2. Bhagwath, S. G., Hjortso, M. A.: J. Biotechnol., 2000; 80, 159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Radman, R. et al.: Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 2003; 37, 91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Procházka, S. et al.: Fyziologie rostlin. Praha, Academia, 1998.
  5. Murashige, T., Skoog, F.: Physiol. Plant., 1962; 15, 473. Go to original source...
  6. Siatka, T., Solich, P., Kotyk, R.: Pharmazie, 1998; 53, 273.
  7. Paseková, H., Polá‰ek, M., Solich, P.: Chem. Listy, 1999; 93, 354.
  8. Welch, R. M.: Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 1995; 14, 49. Go to original source...
  9. Mori, T., Sakurai, M., Sakuta, M.: Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 2000; 62, 135. Go to original source...
  10. Gerendas, J. et al.: J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 1999; 162, 241. Go to original source...
  11. Gerendas, J. et al.: Plant Soil, 1998; 203, 127. Go to original source...
  12. Witte, C.-P. et al.: Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 2002; 68, 103. Go to original source...
  13. Rout, G. R., Samantaray, S., Das, P.: Euphytica, 1998; 101, 319. Go to original source...
  14. Oven, M. et al.: Phytochemistry, 2002; 60, 467. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Chatterjee, J., Chatterjee, C.: Plant Sci., 2003; 164, 793. Go to original source...
  16. Nogueira, M. A., Cardoso, E. J. B. N., Hampp, R.: Plant Soil, 2002; 246, 1. Go to original source...
  17. Yang, X. et al.: J. Plant Nutr., 1996; 19, 73. Go to original source...
  18. Pollard, A. J. et al.: Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 2002; 21, 539. Go to original source...
  19. Mgema, W G., Clark, R. B.: J. Plant Nutr., 1995; 18, 983. Go to original source...
  20. Zhang, X. G., Jessop, R. S., Ellison, F.: Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 1999; 30, 2399. Go to original source...
  21. Abou Auda, M. M. et al.: J. Plant Physiol., 2002; 159, 1087. Go to original source...
  22. Mukherjee, S., Ghosh, B., Jha, S.: J. Biotechnol., 2000; 76, 73. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Szakiel, A. et al.: Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2003; 41, 271. Go to original source...
  24. Chattopadhyay, S. et al.: J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2002; 93, 215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Ohlsson, A. B., Berglund, T.: J. Plant Physiol., 1989; 135, 505. Go to original source...
  26. Gavidia, I., Pérez-Bermúdez, P.: Phytochemistry, 1997; 45, 81. Go to original source...
  27. Fulcheri, C., Morard, P., Henry, M.: J. Agric. Food Chem., 1998; 46, 2055. Go to original source...
  28. Sung, L.-S., Huang, S.-Y.: Biotechnol. Prog., 2002; 16, 1135. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Tsoi, B. M. Y., Doran, P. M.: Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 2002; 35, 171. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Zhang, C.-H., Wu, J.-Y.: Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2003; 32, 71. Go to original source...
  31. Sri Andrijany, V., Indrayanto, G., Adi Soehono, L.: Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 1999; 55, 103. Go to original source...
  32. Akita, T., Hina, Y., Nishi, T.: Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 2002; 66, 902. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Gabrielli, R., Gori, P., Aniello, S.: Plant Sci., 1995; 104, 225. Go to original source...
  34. Tewari, R. K. et al.: Plant Sci., 2002; 162, 381. Go to original source...
  35. Hall, J. L.: J. Exp. Bot., 2002; 53, 1. Go to original source...
  36. Cobbett, C. S.: Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2000; 3, 211. Go to original source...
  37. Krämer, U. et al.: Nature, 1996; 379, 635. Go to original source...
  38. McGrath, S. P., Zhao, F.-J.: Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2003; 14, 277. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Zheng, Z., Wu, M.: Plant Sci., 2004; 166, 507. Go to original source...




Czech and Slovak Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.